Nursing for Banderbag Base Hospital - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theNursing for Banderbag Base Hospital. Answer: Introduction Evidence-based care has become a very critical issue and consideration in medical practice as it is one of the pillars that guide clinicians on how to achieve the Triple Aim's objective that enhances quality as well as improves the level of patient satisfaction at reduced costs. This care provides a platform for interaction between the care provider and the patient hence enhances sharing of decision making on medical issues. For the purposes of this task quality and safety and leadership and management are comprehensively discussed with inquiries made in Banderbag Base Hospital. Quality and safety A public inquiry of the activities going on at Banderbag Base Hospital revealed that non-qualified medical officers were found practicing and attending to patients. The Health Minister failed to terminate the contract of a medical director who did not confirm the qualifications of one of the members of his clinical staff. Reports indicated that the officer handled nine cases out of which two were serious and required sensitive medical care. This was a failure that came up as a result of not confirming the credentials of the clinical staff. The case which is currently before the court indicates that the former medical services director deliberately refused to cross-check the qualifications of the clinical officer and some of the employees did not fill appropriately the employment paper as required by employment terms. The organization would have deployed credentialing as a strategy to enhance risk management that culminated into this health system failure. Credentialing allows the health organization to ascertain and justify the qualifications, expertise, and experience that a clinical officer has before he can be allowed to offer medical services (Rozovsky, 2012). Through credentialing the hospital is able to determine the professional ability of the officer thereby enhancing care services that are not only of high quality but also safe within the hospital. Credentialing enhances the safety of the patients as it ensures clinicians practice only within the boundaries of their competence and training (Rader, 2012). It also ensures the clinicians offer services within the capacity of the service for which they are working. In so doing the clinical officers will be having specific and outlined jurisdiction of medical professionalism and practice. All these benefits would enhance the safety of patients as they would be attended to by qualified and justified personal hence an improvement in the quality of their lives. Credentialing provides a standardized process that involves collection of data, primary source verification, and health plans reviews. Through the standardized process, the health care of the patients is assured as it will be left in the hands of individuals of the highest and acceptable experience and professional merit. The process of credentialing should be vigorous and thorough enough before a physician can get into a contract with a health care provider. Electronic credentialing processes offers a more accurate and efficient way of verifying the qualifications and experience of medical practitioners (Page, 2014). Suppose Banderbag Base Hospital adopted this strategy it would have avoided the unethical medical practices that it witnessed. Through credentialing, the hospital could have improved the safety of its patients by ensuring they are attended to by only qualified and those who meet the threshold requirements for practice. The hospital might have lost numerous patients upon such public inquiry and revelation (Rozovsky, 2012). This situation could as well been averted as qualified personnel build trust in patients and makes them feel confident. Leadership and Management For the success of a health care system, health care organizations need more and more from their leaders in order to meet the expectations and demands of a steadily complicating health care system. In order to successfully run a health care organization, a leader is expected to be transparent and open in all his undertakings. An open and transparent leader is one who is authentic, trustable and accessible (Morath, 2015). These traits should be observable in how the leader behaves. An open leader has a sense of purpose. Such a leader maintains his employees by setting to each of them jurisdiction upon which they are to thump their authorities and administer responsibilities (Clark, 2016). He ensures everyone does exactly what he is assigned to do. Open leaders are focused on purpose. They lead by example and motivate their teams to continue providing services. Motivation can be in the form of helping the employees understand what they are supposed to do as opposed to waiting for them to fail and then launch blames and accusations. Through the motivation the employees get right what is expected of them and feel free to consult with the manager on anything they feel is not clear (Clark, 2016). These traits are not evident in the public inquiry done at Banderbag Base Hospital. The infiltration of negligent medical practitioner was a result of failure by the top management to ascertain the qualifications (Clark, 2016). In this regard, the management did not focus on the purpose of ensuring patient safety and quality medical care. It was not to the interest of the medical director to see patients in safe and trustable hands. An open and transparent leader has a sense of focus. This sense would ensure the leader gives specific attention to the quality of the health care provided in the health care organization thereby improving the safety of the patients (West, 2014). A leader who is focused on the safety of the patient would motivate, promote, encourage and reward health care professionals who consolidate their efforts toward achieving patient safety and care. Through open and frank discussions between the leader and his staff, he would be able to advise them on how to go about their tasks as far as maintaining patient safety and high-quality care is concerned. Such discussions would have positive impacts on safety culture in the health organization. The above leadership qualities can as well help in the management of any unprofessional and disruptive behavior by clinical officers. The leader has the oversight over all the employees and therefore able to spot any incompetence or unprofessionalism among the clinicians. By eliminating such traits the safety of the patients is highly enhanced. The leader is able to achieve this by listening to the complaints from the patients or even developing a structured outline on how to perform early enough interventions (Rader, 2012). References Blake, S. (2013). Licensing and credentialing of health care professionals: a literature review. London: Dept. for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO. Clark, C. C. (2016). Creative Nursing Leadership and Management. Beaverton: Jones Bartlett Publishers. Morath, J. M. (2015). To Do No Harm: Ensuring Patient Safety in Health Care Organizations. California: Wiley. Page, A. (2014). Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Oxford: National Academies Press. Pasmore, W. A. (2014). Developing Collective Leadership for Health Care. London: King's Fund. Rader, K. (2012). Appreciative Leadership: Focus on What Works to Drive Winning Performance and Build a Thriving Organization. Pennyslavia: McGraw Hill Professional. Rozovsky, F. A. (2012). Health Care Credentialing: A Guide to Innovative Practices. Manchester: Wolters Kluwer Law Business. West, M. A. (2014). Developing Collective Leadership for Health Care. New York: King's Fund.